From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: HS/SR and smart shutdown |
Date: | 2010-01-21 01:40:51 |
Message-ID: | 3f0b79eb1001201740u48f81a05oe9d8a90425602a06@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> I've been working on my demo, and I'm discovering that due to the
> connection from the walsender and walreceiver, "smart" shutdown from
> pg_ctl doesn't work if replication is active.
>
> This seems worth fixing; if we don't fix it, we should at least document it.
>
> Comments?
Thanks for the report.
Which servers (primary or standby) did you try a "smart" shutdown on?
If it's "primary", could you show me the reproducible test set? At least
in my box, a "smart" shutdown on the primary works fine.
If it's "standby", it's a previously-existing behavior that a "smart"
shutdown doesn't work immediately during recovery. After a recovery
has been completed, it would work. Of course, I agree that such a
behavior should be documented.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-01-21 01:44:43 | Re: HS/SR and smart shutdown |
Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2010-01-21 00:39:29 | Re: Streaming Replication and archiving |