From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Streaming replication and triggering failover |
Date: | 2010-01-08 13:02:53 |
Message-ID: | 3f0b79eb1001080502k3fb511a8rd395d51d9d3af2ff@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Thinking more clearly, my comment above about the trigger file logic
> being backwards was bollocks; if the master is shut down, standby waits
> for the trigger file to appear, not to go away. And creating the trigger
> file during replication causes it to finish, and failover to happen.
>
> Nevertheless, let's make the default "no failover" if no trigger file
> location is configured, and remove the notion that normal shutdown of
> master stops recovery.
You dropped CheckForStandbyTrigger() called at the end of recovery.
I think that this would be problem when an invalid record is found before
we reaches a streaming recovery state. The standby would be out-of-control
of the clusterware, and be brought up. Which might cause a split-brain
syndrome. We should need something to prevent such unexpected
activation?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-01-08 13:31:38 | Re: Streaming replication and triggering failover |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-01-08 12:57:49 | Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Add-On Network |