| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | ACK from walreceiver to walsender |
| Date: | 2010-01-08 08:10:21 |
| Message-ID: | 3f0b79eb1001080010q16696979hb2ccd45a17866b04@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Heikki,
You dropped all the ACKs from walreceiver to walsender. I have no objection
to that, but I think that walsender should handle at least 'X' (which means
that the standby is closing down the socket) and EOF (which means unexpected
loss of standby connection) messages from walreceiver. Otherwise, walsender
might be unable to detect the shutdown of walreceiver for a while.
Thought?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2010-01-08 08:19:05 | Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Add-On Network |
| Previous Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2010-01-08 07:27:59 | Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling |