| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: write ahead logging in standby (streaming replication) |
| Date: | 2009-11-13 05:29:30 |
| Message-ID: | 3f0b79eb0911122129h55624e40y53417dd348d8f898@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Right, those are the possibilities, all four of them have valid use cases in
> the field and are worth implementing. I don't like the label
> "semi-synchronous replication" myself, but it's a valuable feature to
> implement, and that is unfortunately the term other parts of the industry
> use for that approach.
BTW, MySQL and DRBD use the term "semi-synchronous":
http://forge.mysql.com/wiki/ReplicationFeatures/SemiSyncReplication
http://www.drbd.org/users-guide/s-replication-protocols.html
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2009-11-13 05:34:07 | Re: [PATCH] SE-PgSQL/lite (r2429) |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-11-13 05:28:43 | Re: next CommitFest |