Re: write ahead logging in standby (streaming replication)

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: write ahead logging in standby (streaming replication)
Date: 2009-11-12 08:03:37
Message-ID: 3f0b79eb0911120003o1b0aadddg90db49eba55bb79c@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Fujii Masao wrote:
>> The problem is that fsync needs to be issued too frequently, which would
>> be harmless in asynchronous replication, but not in synchronous one.
>> A transaction would have to wait for the primary's and standby's fsync
>> before returning a "success" to a client.
>>
>> So I'm inclined to change the startup process and bgwriter, instead of
>> walreceiver, so as to fsync the WAL for the WAL rule.
>
> Let's keep it simple for now. Just make the walreceiver do the fsync. We
> can optimize later. For now, we're only going to have async mode anyway.

Okey, I'll do that; the walreceiver issues the fsync for each arrival of
the WAL records, and the startup process replays only the records already
fsynced.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2009-11-12 09:27:22 Re: write ahead logging in standby (streaming replication)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-11-12 07:55:54 Re: Patch committers