| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Kolb, Harald (NSN - DE/Munich)" <harald(dot)kolb(at)nsn(dot)com>, "K, Niranjan (NSN - IN/Bangalore)" <niranjan(dot)k(at)nsn(dot)com>, "Czichy, Thoralf (NSN - FI/Helsinki)" <thoralf(dot)czichy(at)nsn(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Synchronous replication: Promotion of Standby to Primary |
| Date: | 2009-05-27 15:00:50 |
| Message-ID: | 3f0b79eb0905270800m7b2b3eb9x68a560774f6a5357@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 21:28 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Kolb, Harald (NSN - DE/Munich)
>> <harald(dot)kolb(at)nsn(dot)com> wrote:
>> > In our use case it's important to have a short failover time.
>> > So everything what keeps the time low, would be good to have.
>>
>> Yes. I think that it's a matter of priority.
>
> Reducing failover time should be the subject of another patch, not
> something to be included in synch rep. That will just make patch bigger
> and harder to commit.
Agreed. I'll concentrate on synch rep itself until it's committed.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-05-27 15:29:35 | Re: Allow vacuumdb to only analyze |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-05-27 14:59:47 | Re: PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up |