From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: New trigger option of pg_standby |
Date: | 2009-05-15 02:32:59 |
Message-ID: | 3f0b79eb0905141932p18409171w365d917fdfe17b82@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> I've finally committed Simon's recovery_end_command patch, as well as the
> changes to pg_standby. There's now smart and fast failover modes, chosen by
> the content of the trigger file, smart mode is the default. A "fast" trigger
> file is truncated, turning it into a "smart" trigger for subsequent
> pg_standby invocations. I believe this is now safe in all the combinations
> discussed, in both fast and smart mode, with or without extra WAL files
> copied to pg_xlog, and also if the last archived WAL file is incomplete.
Thanks for revising my patch and committing it! This seems to work fine
in all the case which I described.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-05-15 04:15:01 | Testing of parallel restore with current snapshot |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-05-14 23:21:58 | Re: Optimizing Read-Only Scalability |