From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Koichi Suzuki <koichi(dot)szk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: V4 of PITR performance improvement for 8.4 |
Date: | 2009-03-10 04:47:02 |
Message-ID: | 3f0b79eb0903092147q5f340c66g80e1898696399a4b@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks. This patch seems to be missing the new readahead.c file. I grabbed
> that from the previous patch version.
Oh, sorry for the mistake. I changed one of Suzuki-san's patches
to be rebased to HEAD again (readahead-20090310.patch).
The other (addShBufCheck-20090120.patch) is not changed.
Comment:
we might reach consistent recovery state *before* redoing the safe
starting point, because readahead slightly delays the actual redo.
Is this safe? If not, the readahead queue should be flushed before
reaching that state?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
readahead-20090310.patch | application/octet-stream | 39.3 KB |
addShBufCheck-20090120.patch | application/octet-stream | 6.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2009-03-10 05:02:55 | Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-03-10 04:23:44 | Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704) |