| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: Hot standby, recovery infra | 
| Date: | 2009-02-26 19:32:07 | 
| Message-ID: | 3f0b79eb0902261132i7c62c6dbw211fe6964139c69e@mail.gmail.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> I think the real problem here is that pg_standby traps SIGQUIT. The startup
> process doesn't receive the SIGQUIT because it's in system(), and pg_standby
> doesn't propagate it to the startup process either because it traps it.
Yes, you are right.
> I think we should simply remove the signal handler for SIGQUIT from
> pg_standby.
+1
> I don't see how that helps, as we already have this in there:
>
>        signaled = WIFSIGNALED(rc) || WEXITSTATUS(rc) > 125;
>
>        ereport(signaled ? FATAL : DEBUG2,
>                (errmsg("could not restore file \"%s\" from archive: return code %d",
>                                xlogfname, rc)));
>
> which means we already ereport(FATAL) if the restore command dies with SIGQUIT.
SIGQUIT should kill the process immediately, so I think that the startup
process as well as other auxiliary process should call exit(2) instead of
ereport(FATAL). Right?
Regards,
-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-02-26 19:49:16 | Re: Hot standby, recovery infra | 
| Previous Message | Dave Gudeman | 2009-02-26 19:13:46 | a proposal for an extendable deparser |