Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "K, Niranjan (NSN - IN/Bangalore)" <niranjan(dot)k(at)nsn(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches
Date: 2009-02-24 15:51:16
Message-ID: 3f0b79eb0902240751t13231593g17fbef70664d4444@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 3:47 PM, K, Niranjan (NSN - IN/Bangalore)
<niranjan(dot)k(at)nsn(dot)com> wrote:
> Could you please let me know what are the outstanding features that are still to be developed in the respective patches?
>
> I'am currently referring the wiki: "Todo and Claim" for NTT and for HotStandby, i see that almost all issues are closed. Are there any features / refactoring / bugs still need to be fixed.

At least I'm planning to work on the following two items of Synch Rep for v8.5.
Of course, Synch Rep works fine without these features.

- Address the problem which the signals cannot interrupt poll() and select()
on some platforms.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-12/msg00438.php

- Add new feature which transfers all WAL records via the direct connection
between the primary and the standby. In other words, get rid of
file-based log shipping part from the patch.
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/496B9495.4010902@enterprisedb.com

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2009-02-24 16:46:24 Re: Sync replication tests
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-02-24 15:46:14 Re: GIN fast insert