Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code

From: "Fujii Masao" <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code
Date: 2008-12-23 14:36:47
Message-ID: 3f0b79eb0812230636t7c15174ej227e85628bab08b9@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:31 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Of course, since I'm not planning to tackle that problem in 8.4,
> I would not add "additional" synchronization point.

Second thought:
For normal shutdown case, we probably should force synchronous
replication in CreateCheckPoint at least.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2008-12-23 14:51:03 Re: incoherent view of serializable transactions
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2008-12-23 14:31:56 Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code