| From: | "Fujii Masao" <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: How should pg_standby get over the gap of timeline? |
| Date: | 2008-11-20 14:50:34 |
| Message-ID: | 3f0b79eb0811200650x1f34c741wd8f895bb7bee3ad7@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, Heikki. Thanks for the comment!
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Fujii Masao wrote:
>>
>> In the current Synch Rep patch, the standby cannot catch up with the
>> primary which has a bigger timeline.
>
> That would only happen if you've performed an archive recovery in the
> primary. If you've done PITR in the primary, I don't think there's any
> guarantee that it's even possible to catch up the standby. The standby might
> already have replayed a WAL file from an earlier timeline, that isn't part
> of the history of the bigger timeline.
I assume the situation of making the standby (the original primary) catch up
with the primary (the original standby) after failover. Since a timeline is
incremented when a failover finishes archive recovery on a standby, the
timelines differ between two servers.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-11-20 14:58:42 | Error arguments in pl_exec.c |
| Previous Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2008-11-20 14:45:30 | Re: Hot Standby (commit fest version - v5) |