From: | Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo(dot)romano(at)notorand(dot)it> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Variadic polymorpic functions |
Date: | 2010-01-27 15:49:05 |
Message-ID: | 3eff28921001270749x67e02cc5j8175efedee128a09@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
2010/1/27 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> Hello
>
> I add sprintf function. Now I think, we can add new contrib module
> (string functions) with both function - format and sprintf. These
> functions are relative different, so they can exists separately.
> Format is simpler and faster. Sprintf is more powerful but slower.
>
> postgres=# select pst.format('now is %', current_time);
> format
> ---------------------------
> now is 16:34:26.203728+01
> (1 row)
>
> postgres=# select pst.sprintf('now is %s', current_time);
> sprintf
> --------------------------
> now is 16:34:45.24919+01
>
> Regards
> Pavel Stehule
Yeah!
But why still on separate schema?
I'd rather put them all in the public one, so you don't need the "pst." anymore.
Just like (most of) all other contrib mudules ...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2010-01-27 15:52:10 | Re: Variadic polymorpic functions |
Previous Message | Igor Neyman | 2010-01-27 15:40:51 | relation between records in "main" and "toast" tables |