From: | Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo(dot)romano(at)notorand(dot)it> |
---|---|
To: | Adrian von Bidder <avbidder(at)fortytwo(dot)ch> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: About partitioning |
Date: | 2010-01-20 10:57:37 |
Message-ID: | 3eff28921001200257x14cffce7v5e2dc121713eca64@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
2010/1/20 Adrian von Bidder <avbidder(at)fortytwo(dot)ch>:
> Hi,
>
> [ creating db partitions on demand ]
>
> On Wednesday 20 January 2010 11.20:21 Vincenzo Romano wrote:
>> In case 1 I need to inspect the catalog with at least a select, while
>> in case 2 I need to trap errors.
>> In my (little) experience trapping errors is slow, so I would go for
>> option 1.
>
> Trapping/handling the error might be slow, but remember that creating a new
> partition (presumably) doesn't happen often (and creating the partition is
> slow anyway.) In case 1 (check if the partition exists before insert),
> *every* *single* *insert* is slower because you first query the catalog,
> while in case 2, the normal case (insert into existing partition) is fast
> and only the rare case (how is your partitioning? 1000000 or more rows per
> partition on average? I'd think it's quite a lot because why else partition
> the data at all...?) is slow.
>
> cheers
> -- vbi
Hmmm ... also trapping would happen for every single line being inserted ...
--
Vincenzo Romano
NotOrAnd Information Technologies
NON QVIETIS MARIBVS NAVTA PERITVS
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz | 2010-01-20 11:01:03 | Re: About partitioning |
Previous Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2010-01-20 10:57:00 | Re: Size of row-metadata? |