| From: | Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo(dot)romano(at)notorand(dot)it> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Scott Mead <scott(dot)lists(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "adrian(dot)klaver" <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | R: Re: R: Re: R: Re: Weird EXECUTE ... USING behaviour |
| Date: | 2010-01-14 08:41:10 |
| Message-ID: | 3eff28921001140041o7f82f2b4q4d62a6194040a95c@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
The documentation says (also in v8.5) "These symbols refer to values
supplied in the USING clause".
"values"and not "variable name or reference". This leads to the useful
feature mentioned a line later in the same page.
Once you have a value replaced you can avoid the restrictions you now
mention on v8.5.
What's the right place to submit proposals?
Il giorno 14 gen, 2010 7:42 m., "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> ha scritto:
Scott Mead <scott(dot)lists(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes: > Well it is in 8.5 Devel,
so it could have bee...
The particular paragraph mentioned was committed here
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2009-11/msg00094.php
but as you note it was just a relocation of a comment that appeared
elsewhere for at least two years before that (and even then, it was
just documenting behavior that had existed since day one).
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Yan Cheng Cheok | 2010-01-14 08:49:32 | Memory Access Violation While Using PQexec |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2010-01-14 08:34:22 | Re: Functions - how to get the date created or updated |