Re: range_agg

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: range_agg
Date: 2019-09-05 17:15:43
Message-ID: 3ec23df2ae34c531399f0e4c8d21f900271cc589.camel@j-davis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 2019-09-01 at 06:26 -0700, Paul A Jungwirth wrote:
> @+ and @- and @* (I dunno why but I kind of like it. We already have
> @> and <@.)

I think I like this proposal best; it reminds me of perl. Though some
might say that's an argument against it.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-09-05 17:32:04 pgsql: Use data directory inode number, not port, to select SysV resour
Previous Message Melanie Plageman 2019-09-05 16:54:33 Re: accounting for memory used for BufFile during hash joins