From: | Juan Pablo Espino <jp(dot)espino(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Another history question |
Date: | 2005-03-23 14:26:32 |
Message-ID: | 3e7daec105032306262277c3d5@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thanks for the explanation. Then, Can I say that PostgreSQL and
Informix are cousins?
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:36:28 -0500, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Juan Pablo Espino <jp(dot)espino(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > My question is if the architecture of postgreSQL were inherited of
> > postgres original project or postgreSQL were developed completely with
> > a new concept. Thanks in advance.
>
> There hasn't been any fundamental rearchitecting since Berkeley days.
> For instance, look at Postgres 4.2 --- those sources are available on
> the net, and if you compare them to current CVS you'll find plenty
> that's recognizably the same code.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2005-03-23 14:45:40 | Re: locks in CREATE TRIGGER, ADD FK |
Previous Message | strk | 2005-03-23 14:15:18 | Re: help with corrupted database |