Re: Another history question

From: Juan Pablo Espino <jp(dot)espino(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Another history question
Date: 2005-03-23 14:26:32
Message-ID: 3e7daec105032306262277c3d5@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thanks for the explanation. Then, Can I say that PostgreSQL and
Informix are cousins?

On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:36:28 -0500, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Juan Pablo Espino <jp(dot)espino(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > My question is if the architecture of postgreSQL were inherited of
> > postgres original project or postgreSQL were developed completely with
> > a new concept. Thanks in advance.
>
> There hasn't been any fundamental rearchitecting since Berkeley days.
> For instance, look at Postgres 4.2 --- those sources are available on
> the net, and if you compare them to current CVS you'll find plenty
> that's recognizably the same code.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2005-03-23 14:45:40 Re: locks in CREATE TRIGGER, ADD FK
Previous Message strk 2005-03-23 14:15:18 Re: help with corrupted database