| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Statement-level rollback |
| Date: | 2017-03-01 15:24:10 |
| Message-ID: | 3e224315-7043-e6da-a000-f2fc1a371e67@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
On 2/28/17 08:17, Tom Lane wrote:
> I do not really see how this would ever get past the compatibility
> problems that forced us to give up on server-side autocommit years ago.
I think it's different because it's not a global setting, it's only a
behavior you select explicitly when you start a transaction block.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-03-01 15:25:06 | Re: Statement-level rollback |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-03-01 15:10:34 | Re: Time to drop old-style (V0) functions? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-03-01 15:25:06 | Re: Statement-level rollback |
| Previous Message | Tsunakawa, Takayuki | 2017-03-01 08:00:49 | Re: Statement-level rollback |