From: | Farhan Husain <russoue(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Abnormal performance difference between Postgres and MySQL |
Date: | 2009-02-25 21:43:49 |
Message-ID: | 3df32b6d0902251343g3a495103n2341bc625ce3b683@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
It was only after I got this high execution time when I started to look into
the configuration file and change those values. I tried several combinations
in which all those values were higher than the default values. I got no
improvement in runtime. The machine postgres is running on has 4 GB of RAM.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> > shared_buffers = 32MB # min 128kB or
> >> > max_connections*16kB
> >>
> >> That's REALLY small for pgsql. Assuming your machine has at least 1G
> >> of ram, I'd set it to 128M to 256M as a minimum.
> >
> > As I wrote in a previous email, I had the value set to 1792MB (the
> highest I
> > could set) and had the same execution time. This value is not helping me
> to
> > bring down the execution time.
>
> No, you increased work_mem, not shared_buffers. You might want to go
> and read the documentation:
>
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/interactive/runtime-config-resource.html
>
> But at any rate, the large work_mem was producing a very strange plan.
> It may help to see what the system does without that setting. But
> changing shared_buffers will not change the plan, so let's not worry
> about that right now.
>
> ...Robert
>
--
Mohammad Farhan Husain
Research Assistant
Department of Computer Science
Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science
University of Texas at Dallas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2009-02-25 21:55:29 | Re: Abnormal performance difference between Postgres and MySQL |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-02-25 21:40:19 | Re: Abnormal performance difference between Postgres and MySQL |