From: | Krishnakant Mane <kkmane(at)riseup(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: managing primary key conflicts while restoring data to table with existing data |
Date: | 2019-09-25 14:24:07 |
Message-ID: | 3dcb8017-9126-26ad-dbc8-99ad31b81d0f@riseup.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 25/09/19 7:50 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 9/25/19 12:15 AM, Krishnakant Mane wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I have been using postgresql for an enterprise quality account's
>> automation and inventory management software called GNUKhata
>> <https://gnukhata.in>
>>
>> Our team is planning to add backup and restore function in the software.
>>
>> But we don't want to dump the entire database and then restore the same.
>>
>> What we are trying to do is to copy data specific to an organization.
>>
>> The challenge here is that I might copy all data (account heads,
>> bills, vouchers etc ) for one organization from an instance on one
>> machine.
>>
>> I take the archive in what ever format to another machine and now
>> attempt to restore.
>>
>> The risk here is for example if the primary key value for orgcode in
>> the organization table is 5, it might conflict with the data where I
>> am attempting it to be restored.
>>
>> Same holds true for bills, invoices etc.
>>
>> A certain account head with accountcode 1 might be already present on
>> the second machine.
>>
>> I am not expecting the users to empty all data from the destination
>> machine before restoring a backup.
>>
>> The reason is that an auditor may have many client's data and one
>> can't predict what primary key values are going to come from a backup.
>>
>> Basically I can even say this is a copy paste instead of a pure
>> backup and restore.
>>
>> Can any one suggest how to handle such conflicts?
>
> Hard to say. If the data is held in common tables(bills, vouchers,
> etc)then the only thing I see happening is changing the PK values to
> an unused value. That could turn into a nightmare though. Not only
> that you lose the connection to the original data source. If the data
> can be broken out into separate tables then I could see placing them
> in their own schema.
>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Krishnakant Mane,
>> Project Founder and Leader,
>> GNUKhata <https://gnukhata.in/>
>> //(Opensource Accounting, Billing and Inventory Management Software)//
>
Hi Adrian,
Even I am thinnking to do some kind of upsert with this situation.
And I would have to set the pkey to an unassigned value when there is
conflict.
I may also choose to revamp the serial by timestamps but don't know if
the target customers would like it.
--
Regards,
Krishnakant Mane,
Project Founder and Leader,
GNUKhata <https://gnukhata.in/>
//(Opensource Accounting, Billing and Inventory Management Software)//
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christoph Berg | 2019-09-25 14:29:33 | Re: Upgrading old server |
Previous Message | Ekaterina Amez | 2019-09-25 14:21:34 | Upgrading old server |