| From: | "Yvan Blancmunier" <blancmunier(at)yahoo(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | MYSQL |
| Date: | 2002-07-09 15:32:41 |
| Message-ID: | 3d2af1b2@post.usenet.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
**** Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****
Hello, it(he) adorned that myqsl is not very successful for replication,
backup, mirroring... At first is it true? Compared with PostGreSQL, which
one is the best one ? Concretely what are these problems for MySQL? It is
"just" slower. Or then downright not reliable? I am fond of the slightest
indication, then, please, do not hesitate to announce me your personal
experiences!!! Thank you in advance, Yvan
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
*** Usenet.com - The #1 Usenet Newsgroup Service on The Planet! ***
http://www.usenet.com
Unlimited Download - 19 Seperate Servers - 90,000 groups - Uncensored
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Henrik Steffen | 2002-07-09 15:33:58 | Re: Serious Crash last Friday |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-07-09 15:32:36 | Re: problem GMT time |