From: | ptjm(at)interlog(dot)com (Patrick TJ McPhee) |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Optimising Union Query. |
Date: | 2005-04-23 22:39:14 |
Message-ID: | 3d014hF6ps78jU2@uni-berlin.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
In article <4268F322(dot)1040106(at)thales-is(dot)com>,
Rob Kirkbride <rob(dot)kirkbride(at)thales-is(dot)com> wrote:
% I've done a explain analyze and as I expected the database has to check
% every row in each of the three tables below but I'm wondering if I can
This is because you're returning a row for every row in the three
tables.
% select l.name,l.id from pa i,locations l where i.location=l.id union
% select l.name,l.id from andu i,locations l where i.location=l.id union
% select l.name,l.id from idu i,locations l where i.location=l.id;
You might get some improvement from
select name,id from locations
where id in (select distinct location from pa union
select distinct location from andu union
select distinct location from idu);
this query might be helped by an index on location in each of those
three tables, but probably not.
--
Patrick TJ McPhee
North York Canada
ptjm(at)interlog(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2005-04-23 23:22:33 | Re: Pgpool questions |
Previous Message | William Yu | 2005-04-23 22:30:28 | Re: UltraSPARC versus AMD |