| From: | DGPickett <DGPickett(at)aol(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ResultSetMetaData.getColumnDisplaySize returns 2147483647 ? |
| Date: | 2009-02-26 19:53:10 |
| Message-ID: | 3c7f373b-77e6-4860-984e-101af492abe3@f37g2000vbf.googlegroups.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Feb 26, 1:18 pm, bo(dot)(dot)(dot)(at)ejurka(dot)com (Kris Jurka) wrote:
> The server is responsible for determining the type and length of data, not
> the JDBC driver. The server tells the JDBC driver that it is unknown and
> the driver has to do something with it. You are still ignoring the fact
> that there must be cases where the server cannot possibly know the length
> of a piece of data even if it was capable of of handling the simpler
> cases.
>
> Kris Jurka
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-j(dot)(dot)(dot)(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
Well, can the JDBC team raise this issue with the postgres server
team, that many relatively obvious cases are being marked 'width
unknown'?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2009-02-26 20:54:46 | Re: ResultSetMetaData.getColumnDisplaySize returns 2147483647 ? |
| Previous Message | Kris Jurka | 2009-02-26 18:18:55 | Re: ResultSetMetaData.getColumnDisplaySize returns 2147483647 ? |