Re: Getting better results from valgrind leak tracking

From: "Andres Freund" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Getting better results from valgrind leak tracking
Date: 2021-03-17 15:15:43
Message-ID: 3c52ffa1-d46d-4838-9e67-a9760399ecee@www.fastmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Wed, Mar 17, 2021, at 07:16, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > On 2021-03-16 20:50:17 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> Meanwhile, I'm still trying to understand why valgrind is whining
> about the rd_indexcxt identifier strings. AFAICS it shouldn't.

I found a way around that late last night. Need to mark the context itself as an allocation. But I made a mess on the way to that and need to clean the patch up before sending it (and need to drop my girlfriend off first).

Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2021-03-17 15:17:01 Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view?
Previous Message iwata.aya@fujitsu.com 2021-03-17 15:06:14 RE: libpq debug log