From: | Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Kirk Wolak <wolakk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: PoC: Simplify recovery after dropping a table by LOGGING the restore LSN |
Date: | 2024-11-26 13:42:39 |
Message-ID: | 3bda6b56-16bd-48fe-8e23-5ef58a6a4e34@uni-muenster.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Andrey, Nikolay, and Kirk
On 08.11.24 04:46, Kirk Wolak wrote:
> Hackers,
> The concept was driven by an all too common support request. A user
> accidentally dropped the wrong table. (this could also be applied to
> dropping a database, etc).
>
> If we had the LSN before the drop, this would be easier. So we
> actually log the LSN when the lock is required so that we have an
> accurate LSN and the recovery is much simpler.
>
I've tested the patch it it works as described.
postgres=# CREATE TABLE t();
postgres=# SELECT pg_current_wal_lsn( );
pg_current_wal_lsn
--------------------
0/2A0677D8
(1 row)
postgres=# DROP TABLE t;
2024-11-26 14:12:28.915 CET [338209] LOG: Aquired drop table lock on
table t. Restore at 0/2A0677D8
2024-11-26 14:12:28.915 CET [338209] STATEMENT: DROP TABLE t;
A few comments:
1) non "permanent" tables
Since TEMPORARY TABLES are automatically dropped in the end of a
session, simply leaving a session that contains a TEMPORARY TABLE also
logs the LSN:
postgres=# CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE t_temporary AS SELECT
generate_series(1,100);
SELECT 100
postgres=# quit
2024-11-26 14:34:26.596 CET [386777] LOG: Aquired drop table lock on
table t_temporary. Restore at 0/2A149EC0
Dropping the TEMPORARY TABLE also triggers this log message
postgres=# CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE t_temporary AS SELECT
generate_series(1,100);
postgres=# DROP TABLE t_temporary;
2024-11-26 14:35:13.174 CET [387378] LOG: Aquired drop table lock on
table t_temporary. Restore at 0/2A1664E8
2024-11-26 14:35:13.174 CET [387378] STATEMENT: DROP TABLE t_temporary;
The same applies for UNLOGGED TABLES:
postgres=# CREATE UNLOGGED TABLE t_unlogged AS SELECT
generate_series(1,100);
postgres=# SELECT * FROM page_header(get_raw_page('public.t_unlogged',0));
lsn | checksum | flags | lower | upper | special | pagesize | version |
prune_xid
-----+----------+-------+-------+-------+---------+----------+---------+-----------
0/0 | 0 | 0 | 424 | 4992 | 8192 | 8192 | 4
| 0
(1 row)
postgres=# DROP TABLE t_unlogged;
2024-11-26 14:33:00.397 CET [338209] LOG: Aquired drop table lock on
table t_unlogged. Restore at 0/2A143DC8
2024-11-26 14:33:00.397 CET [338209] STATEMENT: DROP TABLE t_unlogged;
2) log message readability
For better readability, perhaps the table name should be logged with
double quotes, as in :
2024-11-26 13:25:35.525 CET [338209] ERROR: table "x" does not exist
2024-11-26 13:25:35.525 CET [338209] STATEMENT: DROP TABLE x;
3) format of existing log messages containing LSN
I haven't looked too deep into it, but the log format used by checkpoint
might be helpful for applications that need to parse log files. For
instance, a log entry triggered after a DROP DATABASE:
postgres=# CREATE DATABASE db;
postgres=# DROP DATABASE db;
2024-11-26 13:30:08.166 CET [329713] LOG: checkpoint starting:
immediate force wait
2024-11-26 13:30:08.177 CET [329713] LOG: checkpoint complete: wrote 3
buffers (0.0%), wrote 1 SLRU buffers; 0 WAL file(s) added, 0 removed, 1
recycled; write=0.002 s, sync=0.002 s, total=0.011 s; sync files=4,
longest=0.001 s, average=0.001 s; distance=4306 kB, estimate=4308 kB;
lsn=0/318AFD8, redo lsn=0/318AF80
> This is a rough patch, very simple and effective. We are looking
> for feedback.
>
> Comments are appreciated!
>
> Should we ALSO consider this for:
> - DROP DATABASE
> - TRUNCATE TABLE
> - DELETE (only when it is without a WHERE clause?)
> - UPDATE (only when it is without a WHERE clause?)
>
+1
Thanks!
Best, Jim
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2024-11-26 13:48:05 | Re: Potential ABI breakage in upcoming minor releases |
Previous Message | Japin Li | 2024-11-26 13:25:56 | Re: Auto Vacuum optimisation |