Re: Code quality issues in ICU patch

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Code quality issues in ICU patch
Date: 2017-06-24 14:03:25
Message-ID: 3bd750fc-27da-ffbd-825c-313f538bcdfd@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 6/23/17 12:31, Tom Lane wrote:
> icu_to_uchar() and icu_from_uchar(), and perhaps other places, are
> touchingly naive about integer overflow hazards in buffer size
> calculations. I call particular attention to this bit in
> icu_from_uchar():
>
> len_result = UCNV_GET_MAX_BYTES_FOR_STRING(len_uchar, ucnv_getMaxCharSize(icu_converter));
>
> The ICU man pages say that that macro is defined as
>
> #define UCNV_GET_MAX_BYTES_FOR_STRING(length, maxCharSize) (((int32_t)(length)+10)*(int32_t)(maxCharSize))
>
> which means that getting this to overflow (resulting in
> probably-exploitable memory overruns) would be about as hard as taking
> candy from a baby.

Here is a patch that should address this.

(I don't think the overruns were exploitable. You'd just get a buffer
overflow error from the ucnv_* function.)

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Refine-memory-allocation-in-ICU-conversions.patch text/plain 2.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2017-06-24 14:36:11 Re: Causal reads take II
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2017-06-24 12:54:34 Re: Fix a typo in snapmgr.c