From: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Linux Filesystem for PG |
Date: | 2005-03-29 02:42:23 |
Message-ID: | 3artkeF6dlt87U1@individual.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Actually, it is common for "obvious" facts to be entirely incorrect.
-> ext3 wouldn't "die" with a file of that size; it supports files up
to about 2TB in size, and 8GB shouldn't be an "uncomfortable" size
-> PostgreSQL normally switches to a new file at 1GB intervals, so
that no file is ever larger than 1GB in size
That's not to say that ext3 would be my "favorite" for the purpose;
while I am not entirely decided as to the relative merits of JFS and
XFS, I'd generally prefer them to ext3.
--
let name="cbbrowne" and tld="gmail.com" in name ^ "@" ^ tld;;
http://linuxdatabases.info/info/slony.html
"If you haven't settled on your final year project, perhaps you would
like to write a C compiler that turns code into Turing machines : I
don't see anything wrong with that" -- Arthur Norman
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2005-03-29 04:15:20 | Re: sub query constraint |
Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2005-03-29 01:25:58 | Re: sorting Chinese varchar field |