Re: Should we warn against using too many partitions?

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we warn against using too many partitions?
Date: 2019-05-24 05:57:54
Message-ID: 3ac5a68e-8737-cef5-84c3-0f427d3015c5@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019/05/24 13:37, David Rowley wrote:
> I've attached 3 patches of what I think should go into master, pg11, and pg10.

Thanks for the updated patches.

In pg11 and pg10 patches, I see this text:

+ Whether using table inheritance or native partitioning, hierarchies

Maybe, it would better to use the word "declarative" instead of "native",
if only to be consistent; neighboring paragraphs use "declarative".

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vik Fearing 2019-05-24 06:17:12 Aggregate error message
Previous Message Amit Langote 2019-05-24 05:47:00 Re: Excessive memory usage in multi-statement queries w/ partitioning