From: | "Daniel Verite" <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Thorsten Schöning" <tschoening(at)am-soft(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Concurrenctly running CREATE TEMP TABLE IF NOT EXISTS [...] AS [...] |
Date: | 2020-06-08 09:05:02 |
Message-ID: | 3ab95c06-a632-4601-8ccc-2f285a587f09@manitou-mail.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thorsten Schöning wrote:
> I'm using "CREATE TEMP TABLE IF NOT EXISTS [...] AS [...]" and the
> associated queries can take a long time. So the following lists some
> questions about executing those concurrently, even thouzgh I've
> already read threads like the following:
> > The bottom line is that CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS doesn't pretend
> > to handle concurrency issues any better than regular old CREATE
> > TABLE, which is to say not very well.[...]
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmoZAdYVtwBfp1FL2sMZbiHCWT4UPrzRLNnX1Nb30Ku3-gg@mail.gmail.com
The caveat you mention about IF NOT EXISTS does not apply to
temporary tables, as they're not shared across sessions.
That is, if two concurrent transactions execute at the same time
CREATE TEMP TABLE IF NOT EXISTS foo(...)
it can't fail as described above because that creates two distinct tables,
each private to their session.
Best regards,
--
Daniel Vérité
PostgreSQL-powered mailer: https://www.manitou-mail.org
Twitter: @DanielVerite
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thorsten Schöning | 2020-06-08 09:27:37 | Re: Concurrenctly running CREATE TEMP TABLE IF NOT EXISTS [...] AS [...] |
Previous Message | Oleksandr Shulgin | 2020-06-08 08:40:15 | Re: When to use PARTITION BY HASH? |