| From: | Alex Friedman <alexf01(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Doc: clarify possibility of ephemeral discrepancies between state and wait_event in pg_stat_activity |
| Date: | 2025-03-02 10:42:17 |
| Message-ID: | 3aaaddc1-dda9-4d5f-ade5-312a66c3e83a@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> discrepancy will look like. What about we do something much more
> simplified, such
> as the below:
>
> """
> To keep the reporting overhead low, the system does not attempt to synchronize
> activity data for a backend. As a result, ephemeral discrepancies may
> exist between
> the view’s columns.
> """
Yes, I believe it makes sense to make it more generic. Attached v3 with a slight
tweak:
+ in the system. To keep the reporting overhead low, the system does not
attempt to
+ synchronize different aspects of activity data for a backend. As a result,
ephemeral
+ discrepancies may exist between the view's columns.
Best regards,
Alex Friedman
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v3-0001-Clarify-possibility-of-ephemeral-discrepancies-be.patch | text/plain | 1.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2025-03-02 11:44:27 | Options to control remote transactions’ access/deferrable modes in postgres_fdw |
| Previous Message | Dean Rasheed | 2025-03-02 10:29:59 | Re: gamma() and lgamma() functions |