From: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: A problem presentaion about ECPG, DECLARE STATEMENT |
Date: | 2019-09-11 12:32:05 |
Message-ID: | 3a59ae73a1d45c9a4ce225f553cf6e8f47f1be3e.camel@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Kuroda-san,
> This feature, committed last February, has some bugs.
> ...
> * This syntax does not have oracle compatibility.
This in itself is not a bug. If the syntax is not standard compliant,
then it's a bug. That of course does not mean we would not like to be
Oracle compatible where possible.
> In order to modify bugs, I think many designs, implementations,
> and specifications should be changed.
I hope the authors of said patch speak up and explain why they
implemented it as is.
> Is it acceptable for PG12?
In general absolutely.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael at xmpp dot meskes dot org
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Anastasia Lubennikova | 2019-09-11 12:37:59 | Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Effective storage of duplicates in B-tree index. |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2019-09-11 12:30:09 | Re: Write visibility map during CLUSTER/VACUUM FULL |