| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: RangeTblEntry jumble omissions |
| Date: | 2024-02-29 13:14:20 |
| Message-ID: | 3a26d89e-706b-4281-a1e5-9c01ecaa5d9d@eisentraut.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 26.02.24 02:08, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 06:52:54PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>> - funcordinality
>>>> This was probably just forgotten. It should be included because the WITH
>>>> ORDINALITY clause changes the query result.
>>
>>> Agreed.
>>
>> Seems OK.
>
> +1.
Ok, I have added funcordinality for the RTE_FUNCTION case, and left the
others alone.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrey M. Borodin | 2024-02-29 13:19:58 | Re: Injection points: some tools to wait and wake |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-02-29 12:58:21 | Re: RangeTblEntry.inh vs. RTE_SUBQUERY |