Re: vacuum full...

From: Rafael Domiciano <rafael(dot)domiciano(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jessica Richard <rjessil(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: vacuum full...
Date: 2009-02-19 18:01:56
Message-ID: 3a0028490902191001i2057a5ebs1e77b0f8ebf556bb@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

I used to run vacuum full in one of my bases, but now i'm not running
anymore vacuum full, just vacuum analyze in the past 1 month, but the number
of necessary pages is increasing every day, now it's in 311264... there is
any problem this get increasing?
When I runned Reindex few days ago, this number get not decreased.
I now that vacuum full reorders the relation, but it's the only thing that
it does?

Thnks,

Rafael Domiciano

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Jessica Richard <rjessil(at)yahoo(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > I am running "vacuum full" via a shell script for a list of large
> databases
> > now... and I may run out of my scheduled system down time....
> >
> > If I don't finish all databases and kill the script in the middle... am I
> > going to cause any table corruptions since "vacuum full" is rebuilding
> the
> > tables and indexes....
>
> No. But may I ask why you are running vacuum full? Is it a regular
> thing. Do all your tables in all your dbs actually need it?
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2009-02-19 20:11:37 Re: vacuum full...
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2009-02-19 16:37:57 Re: vacuum full...