From: | "Rafael Domiciano" <rafael(dot)domiciano(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Rafael Martinez" <r(dot)m(dot)guerrero(at)usit(dot)uio(dot)no>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Vacuum Problems |
Date: | 2008-11-26 17:21:39 |
Message-ID: | 3a0028490811260921l5d6aac06v54dca32aae672b97@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
I'm not using autovacuum. Regular vacuum goes ok.To see the last 10 lines of
verbose i will need to run vacuum tonight
If a run a reindex before the vacuum full, increase the "speed" of doing
vacuum? I found something about it googling.
2008/11/26 Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
> 2008/11/26 Rafael Domiciano <rafael(dot)domiciano(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> > The database has around 40 Gb.
> > If I not use vacuum full everyday the database get very slow.
> >
> > There is no deadlock on the database.
>
> You didn't mention if you were using autovacuum or not. You also
> didn't mention whether or not you'd tried regular vacuums if for some
> reason you can't use autovacuum. Vacuum full is very intrusive and
> can cause index bloat. It's more of a repair operation than a routine
> maintenance one.
>
> What do the last 10 or so lines of vacuum verbose run as a super user say?
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vishal Arora | 2008-11-26 17:25:11 | Re: PgAgent Job Scehduler is NOT running |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2008-11-26 15:40:41 | Re: Vacuum Problems |