Re: deferring/disabling unique index

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Oleg Lebedev <oleg(dot)lebedev(at)waterford(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: deferring/disabling unique index
Date: 2004-01-09 17:36:45
Message-ID: 3FFEE6AD.8030506@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


>So, does it mean that the only way to disable the index is to drop and
>recreate it? What about setting indisunique to false temporarily?
>
>
>
I am just curious... why would you want to defer a unique constraint?

Sincerely,

Joshua Drake

--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Gamache 2004-01-09 17:36:48 TSearch2 ... ignore word repetition for rank
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-01-09 17:32:34 Re: deferring/disabling unique index