| From: | Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Keith Bottner <kbottner(at)comcast(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: planner, how difficult to ... |
| Date: | 2004-01-05 18:53:47 |
| Message-ID: | 3FF9B2BB.9020802@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>Keith Bottner wrote:
>
>
>>How integrated is the planner into the database? Put another way, how
>>hard would it be to separate the planner from the core database in
>>such a way that it could be easily replaced either during compilation
>>or even better with a runtime setting?
>>
>>
>
>The planner is configurable at run time in many ways. But maybe you
>want to start by explaining your problem instead of presuming a
>solution.
>
>
you can already "change" the planner.
just use GEQO instead of exhaustive searching,
why would you want to change the existing planner?
implementing a rule based planner like the one Oracle had is not a good
idea ;).
regards,
Hans
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oliver Elphick | 2004-01-05 19:05:04 | Re: Announce: Search PostgreSQL related resources |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-01-05 18:52:23 | TODO list |