| From: | Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "D(dot) Dante Lorenso" <dante(at)lorenso(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: psql \d option list overloaded |
| Date: | 2004-01-04 07:22:10 |
| Message-ID: | 3FF7BF22.7040702@paradise.net.nz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Couldn't agree more - syntax like
SHOW TABLES;
is inituitive and somehow "right" - [chuckles] - Mysql does not have
*everything* wrong!
regards
Mark
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>I like the idea of adding a new syntax to show that information using
>simple SQL command syntax, and putting it in the backend so all
>applications can access it. I know we have information schema, and
>maybe that can be used to make this simpler.
>
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-01-04 18:53:36 | Re: psql \d option list overloaded |
| Previous Message | Keith C. Perry | 2004-01-04 01:58:11 | Re: Is my MySQL Gaining ? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2004-01-04 07:27:39 | Re: why the need for is null? |
| Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2004-01-04 07:14:40 | Re: TPC-C and Postgres |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martin Marques | 2004-01-04 12:54:25 | Re: time format |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2004-01-04 06:56:27 | Re: Lock contention (was Re: [PATCHES] update i386 |