| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PL/Java issues |
| Date: | 2004-01-03 02:08:33 |
| Message-ID: | 3FF62421.8050209@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> AFAIK it is not available except for $$$. It looks like the relevant
> standards are parts 1 and 2 of the SQLJ standard (Part 0 covers embedded
> SQL).
>
For working drafts try:
http://www.wiscorp.com/sql/sql_2003_standard.zip
(5WD-13-JRT-2003-09.pdf)
http://www.wiscorp.com/sql/sqljrout.zip
(SQLJ Part 1--SQL Routines)
http://www.wiscorp.com/sql/sqljtype.zip
(SQLJ Part 2--SQL Types)
Joe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Travers | 2004-01-03 03:59:44 | Re: Bug and/or feature? Complex data types in tables... |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-01-03 01:21:39 | Re: PL/Java issues |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-01-03 06:34:43 | Re: For Tom Lane |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-01-03 01:21:39 | Re: PL/Java issues |