| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mike Nolan <nolan(at)gw(dot)tssi(dot)com> |
| Cc: | kbd <kevin07(at)optonline(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: hardware requirements under Redhat |
| Date: | 2003-12-25 00:33:36 |
| Message-ID: | 3FEA3060.3050109@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
>
>I doubt there is a general rule as to which is better, it will depend
>upon the individual circumstances (including budget).
>
>
It is my experience that 0+1 is a bit faster that RAID 5.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>Were you told why that was the wrong choice?
>--
>Mike Nolan
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC - S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming, shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-222-2783 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gavin M. Roy | 2003-12-25 02:16:50 | Re: Postgresql 7.4.1 Compile problem for SCO 5.0.5 |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2003-12-25 00:28:58 | Re: [GENERAL][HACKERS]data fragmentation |