Re: PostgreSQL port to pure Java?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: jm(at)poure(dot)com
Cc: ivelin(at)apache(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL port to pure Java?
Date: 2003-12-23 22:42:51
Message-ID: 3FE8C4EB.4020003@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jean-Michel POURE wrote:

>Le Mardi 09 Décembre 2003 16:15, Ivelin Ivanov a écrit :
>
>
>>I think that a co-bundle between an open source J2EE
>>container like JBoss and a scalable database like
>>PostgreSQL will be a blast.
>>
>>
>
>Why not cut all trees on earth and replace them with plastic? Before that, we
>need to port mankind DNA to Windows 3.1 in order to improve speed.
>
>
>
That seems a bit harsh. Personally I think porting PostgreSQL to java is
silly but there is some argument to the benefit from his idea. If you are a
java programmer.

Sincerely,

Joshua Drake

>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>
>

--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-12-23 23:39:54 Re: PostgreSQL port to pure Java?
Previous Message Ivelin Ivanov 2003-12-23 22:36:11 Re: PostgreSQL port to pure Java?