From: | Manfred Spraul <manfred(at)colorfullife(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Issue with Linux+Pentium SMP Context Switching |
Date: | 2003-12-19 20:12:02 |
Message-ID: | 3FE35B92.1000804@colorfullife.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Initial debug logging of a test on one Xeon system demonstrating this issue
>showed a very large number of unattributed semop() calls. We are still
>following up on this.
>
Postgres has it's own user space spinlock and semaphore implementation.
Both fall back to semop if there is contention.
Hmm. You wrote that the problem is Xeon specific, and that AthlonMP are
unaffected. Perhaps Xeon cpus do not like the s_lock implementation? It
doesn't follow Intel's recommentations:
- no pause instructions.
- always TAS. The recommended approach is nonatomic tests until the
value is 0, then an atomic TAS.
Attached is a gross hack that adds pause instructions. If this doesn't
magically fix your problem, then we must figure out what causes the
semop calls, and avoid them.
Could you ask your Linux hackers why they blame the shared memory
implementation in postgres? I don't see any link between shared memory
and lock contention.
--
Manfred
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
patch-spinlock-i386 | text/plain | 497 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-12-19 20:41:07 | Re: How can I return a pointer to a use structure from a function |
Previous Message | Chongbing Liu | 2003-12-19 19:34:34 | How can I return a pointer to a use structure from a function |