From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | "Sean P(dot) Thomas" <spt(at)ulanji(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Optimizing FK & PK performance... |
Date: | 2003-12-17 01:17:28 |
Message-ID: | 3FDFAEA8.1090607@familyhealth.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
> 1. Is there any performance difference for declaring a primary or
> foreign key a column or table contraint? From the documentation, which
> way is faster and/or scales better:
>
>
> CREATE TABLE distributors (
> did integer,
> name varchar(40),
> PRIMARY KEY(did)
> );
>
> CREATE TABLE distributors (
> did integer PRIMARY KEY,
> name varchar(40)
> );
No difference - they're parsed to exactly the same thing (the first
version).
> 2. Is DEFERRABLE and INITIALLY IMMEDIATE or INITIALLY DEFERRABLE
> perferred for performance? We generally have very small transactions
> (web app) but we utilize a model of:
No idea on this one :/
Chris
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Shadovitz | 2003-12-17 04:37:02 | Re: Why is VACUUM ANALYZE <table> so slow? |
Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2003-12-17 01:17:26 | Re: Nested loop performance |