From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers-win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] fork/exec patch |
Date: | 2003-12-16 18:45:34 |
Message-ID: | 3FDF52CE.3020507@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
>>BTW, is anyone working on building in code to run as a
>>service? Or do we
>>plan to use a service wrapper?
>
>
> I think custom code will be needed. It could be in the form of a wrapper
> or in the form of integrated code. But if you use one of the general
> wrappers, it's going to be hard to teach it to send signals to the
> postmaster in the way we want (regardless of which method is chosen for
> signals)
>
Right. I expect we'll need 3 extra command line switches: one to install
as a service, one to remove the service, and one to run as a service. Or
possibly a small wrapper for the install/remove part, plus one extra
command switch.
> But it's probably best to just get it up and running on a command prompt
> first :-)
>
Indeed.
Another question: do we plan to use the Windows event log instead of or
as well as syslog?
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2003-12-16 18:48:57 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] fork/exec patch |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2003-12-16 18:33:07 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] fork/exec patch |