Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] fork/exec patch

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] fork/exec patch
Date: 2003-12-15 21:12:13
Message-ID: 3FDE23AD.6030706@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian wrote:

>Have you looked at the CONNX signal code on the Win32 page:
>
> http://momjian.postgresql.org/main/writings/pgsql/win32.html
>
>It uses shared memory and events.
>
>
>

Yes, and I just did again. I guess I must be missing something, though -
I don't see what in that code causes the signalled process to call the
handler corresponding to the signal. Maybe I'm just a little brain dead
today ...

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-12-15 21:21:07 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] fork/exec patch
Previous Message Michael Brusser 2003-12-15 20:36:17 conversion_create.sql

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-12-15 21:21:07 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] fork/exec patch
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-12-15 19:44:09 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] fork/exec patch

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-12-15 21:21:07 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] fork/exec patch
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-12-15 19:44:09 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] fork/exec patch