From: | "Andrew G(dot) Hammond" <drew(at)xyzzy(dot)dhs(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Bohmer <bohmer(at)visionlink(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Hardware suggestions for Linux/PGSQL server |
Date: | 2003-12-15 04:17:19 |
Message-ID: | 3FDD35CF.6080103@xyzzy.dhs.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
I don't know what your budget is, but there are now 10k RPM SATA 150
drives on the market. Their price/performance is impressive. You may
want to consider going with a bunch of these instead of SCSI disks (more
spindles vs. faster spindles). 3ware makes a hardware raid card that can
drive up to 12 SATA disks. I have been told by a few people who have
used it that the linux driver is very solid.
Drew
Jeff Bohmer wrote:
>> Just one more piece of advice, you might want to look into a good
>> battery
>> backed cache hardware RAID controller. They work quite well for heavily
>> updated databases. The more drives you throw at the RAID array the
>> faster
>> it will be.
>
>
> I've seen this list often recommended such a setup. We'll probably
> get battery-backed write cache and start out with a 4 disk RAID 10
> array. Then add more disks and change RAID 5 if more read performance
> is needed.
>
> Thanks,
> - Jeff
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2003-12-15 05:14:29 | Re: Hardware suggestions for Linux/PGSQL server |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2003-12-15 02:10:15 | Re: [PERFORM] Tables Without OIDS and its effect |