From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] fork/exec patch |
Date: | 2003-12-14 23:43:54 |
Message-ID: | 3FDCF5BA.5030608@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches |
[moved to hackers / win32]
Claudio Natoli wrote:
>Or do people have strong leanings towards "fix as you go along"? Just feels
>like that way could see us getting bogged down making things "perfect"
>instead of advancing the port...
>
>
>
w.r.t. Win32, I think the way to proceed is (in this order):
. make it work
. make it elegant
. make it fast
BTW, I agree with Bruce, you're doing excellent stuff. Now for the fun
part (signals).
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-12-14 23:45:01 | Re: Walker/mutator prototype. |
Previous Message | Dennis Bjorklund | 2003-12-14 23:31:10 | Re: fork/exec patch |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-12-14 23:53:22 | Re: fork/exec patch |
Previous Message | Dennis Bjorklund | 2003-12-14 23:31:10 | Re: fork/exec patch |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-12-14 23:53:22 | Re: fork/exec patch |
Previous Message | Dennis Bjorklund | 2003-12-14 23:31:10 | Re: fork/exec patch |