| From: | Brendan Jurd <blakjak(at)blakjak(dot)sytes(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Inheritance and foreign keys |
| Date: | 2003-12-08 22:34:43 |
| Message-ID: | 3FD4FC83.50205@blakjak.sytes.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
Peter Eisentraut wrote:<br>
<blockquote cite="mid200312082138(dot)54363(dot)peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Brendan Jurd wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I have a few projects that could benefit from inherited table
structure, and it's a very cool idea, but this inability of indexes
to include derived tables is a real functionality-killer. It's not
"Object Relational" if the objects can't be related to anything!
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Hehe, but the "relational" means that the data is stored in relations,
not that the data has to be related to other data.
</pre>
</blockquote>
Fair call<br>
<blockquote cite="mid200312082138(dot)54363(dot)peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net" type="cite">
<pre wrap=""></pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">If someone could give me an idea of how far away this fix is, I'd be
grateful.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
No one has really expressed intentions to fix this, so I wouldn't hold
my breath.
</pre>
</blockquote>
So it's a case of "if you really want it fixed, fix it yourself"? If
only I knew anything about writing DBMS internals, I would have a shot
at it.<br>
<br>
/me proceeds to not hold breath<br>
<br>
BJ<br>
</body>
</html>
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| unknown_filename | text/html | 1.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josué Maldonado | 2003-12-08 22:57:30 | Manual record locking |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-12-08 22:29:53 | Re: Is the COMMUTATOR clause required for self commutative operators? |