From: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kurt Roeckx <Q(at)ping(dot)be> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CVS HEAD compile failure |
Date: | 2003-12-08 19:17:24 |
Message-ID: | 3FD4CE44.8000309@Yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 01:27:35PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> > Tom Lane wrote:
>> >> I've been able to reproduce this on one of my machines, and it's nasty.
>>
>> > In that case I'm confused about why this code compiles on my machine:
>>
>> What compiler are you using? I'm using gcc 2.95.3 (on the machine that
>> shows the failure)
>
> I can compile current cvs with gcc 2.95.3, openssl 0.9.7b and
> zlib 1.2.1.
>
> zlib 1.2.1 still has the same typedef though.
compile success with gcc 2.96 here.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-12-08 19:19:58 | Re: tuning questions |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-12-08 19:03:42 | Re: 73.5 and uw 713 |