Re: are cursors necessary?

From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
Cc: Mark Harrison <mh(at)pixar(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: are cursors necessary?
Date: 2003-12-04 23:45:55
Message-ID: 3FCFC733.9000906@Yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Richard Huxton wrote:

> On Thursday 04 December 2003 22:46, Mark Harrison wrote:
>> res = PQexec(conn, "BEGIN");
>> res = PQexec(conn, "DECLARE myportal CURSOR FOR select * from
>> pg_database"); res = PQexec(conn, "FETCH ALL in myportal");
>> res = PQexec(conn, "CLOSE myportal");
>> res = PQexec(conn, "END");
>
>> Is there any value in my own query-only programs to declaring the cursor
>> for each search?
>
> Well - if you want to scroll forward/backward through the resultset, you'd
> want a cursor. Or, if your client had limited memory and the resultset was
> large you might want to do so. PG will return all rows at once, so if your
> SELECT returns 5 million rows you'll use a lot of RAM on the client side.
>

You really think people would ever want to store more than 640 rows?

Jan

--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message btober 2003-12-05 00:56:08 XOR on strings
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2003-12-04 23:40:57 Re: Money data type in PostgreSQL?