| From: | Sean Shanny <shannyconsulting(at)earthlink(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Has anyone run on the new G5 yet |
| Date: | 2003-12-04 00:24:21 |
| Message-ID: | 3FCE7EB5.7030809@earthlink.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Gaetano,
I don't believe we have ever run the system without it turned on.
Another switch to fiddle with. :-)
--sean
Gaetano Mendola wrote:
> Sean Shanny wrote:
>
>> We are currently running on a Dell 2650 with 2 Xeon 2.8 processors in
>> hyper-threading mode, 4GB of ram, and 5 SCSI drives in a RAID 0,
>> Adaptec PERC3/Di, configuration. I believe they are 10k drives.
>> Files system is EXT3. We are running RH9 Linux kernel 2.4.20-20.9SMP
>> with bigmem turned on. This box is used only for the warehouse. All
>> the ETL work is done on this machine as well. DB version is
>> postgreSQL 7.4.
>
>
> Are you experiencing improvment using the hyper-threading ?
>
>
> Regards
> Gaetano Mendola
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | CHEWTC | 2003-12-04 03:09:59 | Re: Minimum hardware requirements for Postgresql db |
| Previous Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2003-12-03 23:54:59 | Re: A question on the query planner |